By Michael McMaster for Enlivening Edge Magazine
Emergent evolution has been the driving force of the planet since time began. Emergence is that phenomenon which creates novelty — new features and even new entities which cannot be reverse-engineered. These innovations are creations from the unintentional interplay of elements of existence that cannot be reproduced on purpose. If we could reproduce the same thing by repetition then it would not be an event of emergence. Emergent evolution by its nature increases the complexity of the world and, is by definition, non-linear. That which emerges from lower levels of complexity can be neither predicted nor controlled. This has profound implications for the craft of management. In particular, it transforms what it means to be a manager in a complex adaptive organization, which is any for-purpose enterprise.
There are aspects of organizational activity that are linear, predictable, and controllable. A good manager knows which they are and acts accordingly. But by far the most important aspects of organization are a function of its complexity and are not amenable to traditional command and control management.
While complexity cannot be managed, human beings co-evolved with the increasing complexity of the world and hence are capable of being effective in that complexity.
Because we are language-using social beings, we have the capacity and the tools to be comfortable with complexity. We are more adaptive and complex than any other entity, except potentially, our purpose-driven organizations. The important thing to understand is that each member of the organization is inside the social framework; there is no one outside the system working on it; we all are participants in the system. This concept points the way to understanding how to have our organizations function well in every level of complexity that emerges.
What is the nature of organization?
Now we need to understand what an organization is.
Its essence is that it is a complex entity of coordinated action.
The means of that coordination is language. To organize means to order various flows of energy and/or information so that they can coordinate action and results on ever-increasing scales. You can say that an organization is a business or a culture or a social institution or a network of people. All are true. None, however, give us access to their design and operation at a practical level, as does thinking of an organization as a linguistically-coordinated system for producing specific results.
So, if the essence of an organization is a complex adaptive system of coordinated action and the essence of complex adaptive systems is that they are unmanageable, what will a manager manage? In terms of the traditional meaning of manage, not much.
In terms of working with complexity we need to disrupt our thinking and transform the role of manager to include system designer.
While a manger works with people to cause breakthroughs in performance, the major part of this work is development of people and facilitating conversation. As a system designer, a manager needs to focus on the changes in organization design that have the highest likelihood of increasing its ability to adapt, respond, and evolve rapidly in concert with its rapidly changing internal and external environment. The organization design needs to support those development and communication processes.
We are going to use the term manager, from this part forward in this article, to refer to a system designer. Just for this article. I’m sure “manager” will still be the accepted word, but its meaning and significance will be changed forever. It will be transformed.
The work of system design
Let’s look then at the work of a system designed in this context. As we saw earlier, an organization is the ordering of systems (smaller organizations) that are designed to coordinate action. What coordinates action are a purpose and the systems which arrange or order flows to fulfill that purpose. The most important flows are those of energy and information.
This means that at its highest level, the designer of a system orders the flows of energy and information. After that initial ordering, the designer will constantly monitor the system to ensure that it is working as it is supposed to and, equally important, the designer is able to make alterations to the system to make corrections as needed.
A systems designer role is also, by observation, to see where improvements can be made to increase productivity. Much of this will occur in dialogue with others rather than merely in the manager’s head or by reading reports. Innovation will occur from new thinking, experience, information, technology, and many unexpected places, in the course of dialogue.
We might think of managers as managing the flows of information, not so much the content of information, between people, across accepted boundaries, and from sources outside the enterprise framework. What influences these flows in organization design? Human organizations are creatures of language design. The results that your enterprise gets are exactly the results it is designed to get.
If you want different results, you’ll need a different design, a different organization.
The unique nature of intelligent complex adaptive systems (iCAS)
The main features of this approach can only be understood when we see the nature of complex adaptive systems and the particular additional unique aspect of human organizations. The agents in complex adaptive systems produce emergent events and results that cannot be predicted. What can be worked with is the redesign of systems of coordination to take account of each emergent or group of emergent phenomena. So, just by being complex adaptive systems, which organizations are, we must realize we cannot control them. We can, however, influence them. Old-fashioned management will not work. Old-fashioned organization designs will not work.
Want innovation and not getting it? Design more dialogue, more shared information, more distributed intelligence, more introduction of new people, more exploration outside your existing boundaries, and you’ll get more innovation.
The first place to look, however, the one with the most immediate release of energy, is to open curiosity, and to remove interference with natural human activities like sharing information and creating mini-projects to accomplish something.
What is not to be managed is anything outside of this new understanding. That is, people are not to be managed. Complexity is not to be managed. This is just as well because neither can be managed. They share similar basic qualities of adaptability and emergent phenomena. Not only can’t they be managed, they can’t even be controlled. They can only be enhanced or suppressed or killed off.
So, organization design is the heart of management and making adjustments to organization design to improve coordinated action should be the main regular activity of a manager.
What does management mean in relation to independent agents?
Now we’ll up the stakes. Organizations of human social design, like your enterprise, have a unique feature not present anywhere else on the planet. That is, the main agents of the system are individual human beings in systems created by human beings. They are the independent source of energy, ideas, thinking, innovation, information, knowledge exchanges, and all other life forces. Compared to these, all other agents or energy flows are trivial.
This feature, more than any other, makes an organization adaptive. These organizations are intelligent complex adaptive systems (iCAS). That is, their agents are intelligent in their own right–and this creates a new emergent phenomenon: an organization that has intelligence greater than that of any individual in it and greater than merely the sum of those intelligences. The most intelligent life form on the planet is, I assert, human purpose-driven organization.
A manager must be concerned with design that maximizes the intelligence of the organization by liberating the discretionary energy, commitment, and intelligence of its members and also maintains a focus for that—the purpose. The overall purpose is contribution to life on the planet and, at least by association, to the planet itself. The challenge, at all levels of an organization, is to maintain full integrity with what has gone before, in the largest possible context, and what is most contributing to the larger ecologies of markets and society.
What we haven’t considered so far in this writing is the nature of those most important of agents in the complex adaptive system. What is the work of management vis-à-vis the people they are accountable for? Coercion fails to generate action because, after all, the contribution of each member of the organization is ultimately voluntary. So, to create the full coordination of action and maximum participation naturally calls for the fullest satisfaction of higher human values.
The experience of respect, participation in a larger goal, communication and belonging, expressing oneself, contribution, producing value, are the major elements of organizational life that, when present, bring forth the highest possibility from each member of the organization.
Ensuring these experiences are present is perhaps the most high- leverage managerial action to cause lasting benefit for the whole.
The ultimate goal of social organizations and of managers should be to provide venues for doing good work. Management is not about “managing people”. That should be a relief because people are not to be managed. People are to be developed, respected, provided with the tools to do their work. Ensuring the existence of commonly-understood common values, and the existence of processes that coordinate their actions with others to produce satisfying results is also the job of a manager. This is the transformation of management.
I will close with three brief reflections on how “good work” might be described.
“Work is a form of living, with its own intrinsic rewards; any way of organizing work which is at odds with this idea, which treats work instrumentally, as a means only to other ends, is inhuman.” ~ Christopher Alexander from A Pattern Language page 399, Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.
The Buddhist point of view takes the function of work to be at least threefold: to give one a chance to utilize and develop one’s faculties, to enable one to participate in community efforts with others, and to bring forth goods and services that are needed for society’s existence. (paraphrased from Buddhist Economics by E.F. Schumacher in Alexander’s book A Pattern Language, Same reference as above (including page number;) attributed to Resurgence, 275, Kings Road, Kingston, Surrey, Volume 1, Number 11, January 1968.)
“If the nature of work is properly appreciated and applied, it will stand in the same relation to the higher faculties as food is to the physical body. It nourishes and enlivens the higher person and urges one to produce the best one is capable of. It furnishes an excellent background for one to display one’s scale of values and develop one’s personality.” ~ J. C. Kumarappa, Indian economist and philosopher (quoted from same source as above – later in the quote from Schumacher on page 400 of Alexander’s book.)
Michael McMaster has a C.P.A. and management background furthered by studies at the Santa Fe Institute in its early days, applying complex adaptive systems theory to organizational transformation. He has 30 years consulting to large corporations based in this work. His latest book is What IS Organizational Intelligence?: An Intense Primer. Contact +1-604-307-3297 or Michael@transformativeorg.com.